Most PPC audits tell you which keywords to pause. The harder question is whether the click was ever going to convert, or whether you paid for traffic a weak listing threw away. A real Amazon PPC audit checks both: where your campaigns leak budget, and whether the listing can close the sale the ad just bought.
Amazon ecosystem experience
Listings optimized
Brands served
1,000+ verified reviews
Advertising Partner
Amazon Service Provider Network
Best For: Sellers with high ACoS, spend that produces clicks but few orders, an auto campaign nobody has cleaned in months, a flat TACoS that will not move, or an in-house or agency setup they want a second opinion on. Works for single-brand sellers and multi-catalog operators running Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, and Sponsored Display.
An Amazon PPC audit is a structured review of where your ad budget goes and what it earns back, across Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, and Sponsored Display. It works from two sources of truth: your Search Term Report, which shows the actual queries your ads paid for, and your Bulk File, which shows every campaign, ad group, bid, and target in one place. Everything else is interpretation.
The word audit gets used loosely. A tool that connects to your account and returns a color-coded scorecard in ninety seconds is not the same thing as a person reading your Search Term Report line by line. Both call themselves audits. Only one catches the campaign that looks fine on ACoS but is quietly cannibalizing your best organic keyword.
A real audit answers three questions in plain terms. Where is money going out with nothing coming back. Which parts of the account are built in a way that works against you. And when the ads do bring a shopper to the page, does the page convert them or send them back to search. Most audits answer the first, touch the second, and skip the third.
Ad budget rarely disappears in one obvious place. It drains out of a dozen small gaps that each look minor on their own and add up to real money every month. These are the ones we find most often.
Every one of these is fixable. None of them shows up in the single monthly ACoS number most sellers actually look at.
A single broad or auto campaign can pour budget into a query that has never once converted. Left alone for sixty days, it is not a rounding error anymore.
They are useful for discovery. They are also where irrelevant traffic hides. If nobody harvests the winners into exact and negates the rest, the campaign keeps paying for the same bad clicks.
A term that converts well inside a broad campaign is still fighting every other match type in that campaign for budget. Pulled into its own exact-match target, it gets the bid and the control it earned.
This is the one no dashboard flags. A keyword can be relevant, the bid can be reasonable, and the order still never comes, because the main image is weak, the price looks wrong next to the competitor, or the listing has nine reviews and the product beside it has four hundred. That is not a bidding problem. Lowering the bid just buys the same failure more slowly.
If you do not know the ACoS at which a product stops making money, every bid is a guess. Some run too high and burn margin, some run too low and cost you the placement.
A campaign that runs dry by early afternoon is invisible during the evening browse window when a lot of categories actually convert.
Keyword cannibalization drives up your own CPC, because your campaigns are bidding against each other in the same auction.
Top-of-search can convert at a very different rate than product pages, and paying the same multiplier for both leaves money on the table.
The wasted-spend layer. Search term review, negative keyword coverage, and the terms bleeding budget with no orders behind them. Fastest money to recover, and the layer most audits stop at.
Match-type mix, how auto and broad feed exact, keyword cannibalization across campaigns, and whether the account is organized so you can actually control it. Messy structure makes every other fix harder to hold.
Bids checked against a real break-even ACoS, placement multipliers, dayparting, and the attribution window you read results through. A seven-day and a fourteen-day window can tell two different stories about the same campaign.
Whether the listing converts the traffic you are paying for. If the page cannot close the sale, no amount of bid tuning fixes the account — the problem was never in the campaign. Most audits never look here. Usually where the biggest leak is.
This is a human-led review, not an automated scorecard. We read the account the way an operator would before taking it over. Every audit covers the same ground, and we set the priority order after we see the data, not before.
Wasted spend and search terms. We sort the Search Term Report by spend and isolate the queries taking budget without returning orders over a meaningful window, not a three-day snapshot.
Negative keyword coverage. We check what is being blocked and what should be. Most accounts are under-negated, which is why the same bad terms keep reappearing.
Campaign structure and match types. We map how auto, broad, phrase, and exact relate to each other, whether winners are being harvested, and where campaigns are bidding against themselves.
Bids against break-even. We look at whether bids are anchored to the ACoS, where each product stops being profitable, not to a number copied from a blog post.
Placements, budget pacing, and dayparting. We check where impressions convert, whether budgets survive to the hours that matter, and whether top-of-search is earning its multiplier.
Attribution and reporting sanity. We confirm you are reading performance through a consistent attribution window, so the numbers you act on are the real ones.
Conversion diagnostic. We grade the listing the ads point to: main image, secondary images, A+ Content, price position, and review depth, against the specific reason a shopper clicks and then leaves. When the fix is here, we say so plainly, because spending more on ads would only waste more.
The ad-side fixes flow into our Amazon PPC management. The listing-side fixes flow into our creative work, from listing images to A+ Content. The audit tells you which door you actually need.
You will read everywhere that a good ACoS is under 25 to 30 percent and a healthy TACoS is 10 to 15 percent. Those are rules of thumb, not targets. The right ACoS target is set by your margin, and copying a number off a blog is how sellers end up either capping profitable campaigns or bleeding money on unprofitable ones.
Start with break-even ACoS, which is your profit margin before ad spend. Say a product sells for 40 dollars, and, after the cost of goods, Amazon fees, and shipping, you keep 14 dollars. Your margin is 35 percent, so your break-even ACoS is 35 percent. Spend more than 35 percent of that item’s ad revenue on ads, and the advertised sale loses money. Your target ACoS then sits below break-even by however much profit you want to hold from advertised sales, higher when you are launching and buying rank, and lower when you are protecting margin on an established product.
TACoS tells a different story. It measures ad spend against total sales, organic included, so it shows whether your ads are propping up the whole account or supporting an organic base that is growing on its own. A TACoS that keeps climbing while sales stay flat usually means organic rank is slipping and ads are covering for it. That is a signal an audit should catch early.
PPC audits are sold three ways, and the price tells you what you are actually getting.
The free audit is the most common, and it is usually the front door to a monthly management retainer. That is not a criticism. A free audit can be genuinely useful, as long as you know the provider is auditing you as a prospective client, and that the report is built partly to show you why you should hire them. Read it for the findings, not the pitch.
The paid standalone audit is for sellers who already have an in-house team or an agency and want an independent second opinion with no strings attached. You pay for the diagnosis, and you owe nothing after it. This is the right model when you do not want a management handoff, you just want to know what is wrong.
The bundled audit comes built into ongoing management, where the provider audits the account as the first step before they start running it. Fair enough, but you are choosing the manager before you have seen the diagnosis.
What moves the price in any of these is scope: how much you spend on ads, how many campaigns and ad groups the account carries, how large the catalog is, and whether the audit includes the conversion layer or stops at the campaigns. A quote given before anyone has seen your account is a placeholder, not a real number.
One more distinction worth drawing. An automated tool audit and a human-led audit are not the same product. A tool is fast and cheap and good at flagging the obvious: a high-ACoS campaign, an out-of-budget alert. It cannot tell you that a campaign with a healthy ACoS is stealing sales your organic ranking would have won for free, or that your real problem is a main image that loses the click. That reading takes a person.
The audit is only useful if you can act on it. Every finding comes with the size of the problem and the specific fix, not a vague grade.
Every audit includes:
• Findings ranked by how much wasted spend each one is costing you, so the biggest leaks come first.
• A severity rating on each issue, so you know what is urgent and what can wait.
• The specific fix for each finding, and whether it belongs in the campaigns or the listing.
• A prioritized 30, 60, and 90-day action plan, sequenced so the quick recoveries fund the slower structural work.
• A review call to walk through the findings and answer questions before you commit to anything.
You can take the report and run every fix in-house. Nothing in it is locked behind hiring us.
Amazon keeps pushing more of the bidding decision into automation. As that happens, the audit changes shape. The old audit was mostly manual bid tweaks. The new one checks whether the automation is being fed what it needs to make good decisions: clean campaign structure, accurate break-even targets, and a listing that actually converts.
Automation optimizes toward the goal you give it, inside the structure you built. Point it at a messy account with the wrong targets and a weak listing, and it will efficiently spend your budget reaching the wrong outcome. An audit that only checks manual bids is auditing a 2020 account. The work now is making sure the inputs are right, because the machine will scale whatever you hand it, good or bad.
An Amazon PPC audit is a structured review of your advertising account that finds where budget is wasted and what is capping your return. It works from your Search Term Report and Bulk File to check spend efficiency, campaign structure, bids, and whether your listing converts the traffic your ads pay for.
A complete audit checks four layers: wasted spend and search terms, campaign structure and match types, bids and placements against your break-even, and the listing’s ability to convert the click. Most audits stop at the first two. The ad-side fixes feed into PPC management and the listing-side fixes into creative work.
It depends on your ad spend, how many campaigns the account carries, catalog size, and whether the conversion layer is included. Audits are priced free as a lead-in to management, paid as an independent standalone second opinion, or bundled into ongoing management. Ask for a scoped number after the provider has seen the account, not before.
It can be both. A free audit is usually the first step of a management pitch, which is fine as long as you read it for the findings and judge the recommendations on their merits. If the report is all urgency and no specifics, that tells you something too.
There is no universal number. Your target ACoS should sit below your break-even ACoS, which is your margin before ad spend, so a product with a 35 percent margin breaks even at 35 percent ACoS and needs a target under that to profit. A healthy TACoS depends on how much of your sales are organic, and a rising TACoS on flat sales usually means organic rank is slipping.
Clicks without orders is usually a listing problem, not a bidding one. If the keyword is relevant and the bid is reasonable, the shopper is leaving because of the main image, the price, thin reviews, or a listing that does not answer their question, and lowering the bid only buys the same failure more slowly. This is why our audit grades the listing, not just the campaign.
Run a light review monthly to catch new wasted spend, and a deeper structural audit each quarter. Certain events should trigger an off-cycle audit too: a new product launch, a sudden ACoS spike, a budget change, or the run-up to Q4.
An automated tool is fast and good at flagging the obvious, like a high-ACoS campaign or an out-of-budget alert. A manual audit catches what the tool cannot, such as a healthy-looking campaign cannibalizing your organic rank, or a conversion problem that lives in the listing rather than the ads.
A PPC audit points to the fix. These are the services that carry it out once you know where the leak is.
Full campaign management across Sponsored Products, Brands, and Display, for when the audit shows the problem is in the ads and you want a team to run them.
Custom images per SKU, for when the audit shows the click is landing on a listing that cannot convert it.
Image-and-text modules that give a shopper the reasons to buy that a bid can never supply.
